In Washington, the driver who causes a car accident is responsible for your damages, but establishing liability takes time. Personal injury protection, or PIP, pays through your own auto policy in the meantime, regardless of fault, so treatment starts and costs are covered while the liability claim is still being resolved. How PIP is structured under Washington law, and how it connects to any personal injury case that follows, affect both your immediate options and what you ultimately receive at settlement.
Washington is a fault-based state, where the driver who caused the accident is ultimately responsible for your damages. PIP operates differently. It's a first-party coverage paid through your own auto policy, and PIP activates regardless of fault, so your medical bills don't go unpaid while fault and liability are being established.
Under RCW 48.22.085, every auto insurance company in Washington is required to offer PIP as an optional coverage on each new and renewed auto liability policy. You can decline PIP, but only with a signed written rejection. If your insurance company cannot produce a signed rejection, you have the minimum PIP coverage under Washington law, regardless of what you were told when you purchased the policy.
Washington law sets two tiers of PIP coverage. A minimum tier applies by default; a higher tier is available upon written request.
At the minimum level, PIP pays for:
Across both tiers, PIP payments are limited to your actual documented losses, even when your coverage limit is higher. (RCW 48.22.005)
If you request higher limits when purchasing or renewing your policy, your insurance company is required to make them available at an added premium. At the higher tier, PIP pays for:
One additional detail on income continuation: when PIP income benefits combine with workers' compensation, disability coverage, or other income replacement sources, the combined weekly payment cannot exceed 85% of your pre-accident weekly income from work. (RCW 48.22.005)
PIP pays first. In a Washington car accident case, PIP activates immediately and covers your bills while the fault-based claim against the at-fault driver is resolved. A personal injury case against the at-fault driver is where full compensation is pursued — including pain and suffering, future medical costs, long-term lost income, and other categories of loss that fall entirely outside of what PIP covers.
Under Washington administrative law (WAC 284-43-0160), automobile PIP coverage is excluded from the definition of a health benefit plan. PIP pays first, and your health insurance activates only after PIP benefits are fully exhausted. Once coverage shifts to health insurance, your plan's deductibles, co-pays, and network restrictions apply. In practice, billing confusion is a common result when providers or patients attempt to route accident-related treatment through health insurance before PIP is exhausted.
Insurance companies can dispute whether specific treatment qualifies as "reasonable and necessary" under the terms of your PIP policy. They also have the right to request an independent medical examination (IME) to evaluate your condition and ongoing care, and PIP policies typically include cooperation requirements that cover IME requests. In the cases Freeman Law Firm handles, IME requests tend to arrive as treatment costs approach the PIP policy limit. If your PIP benefits are being questioned, delayed, or terminated, Freeman Law Firm can advise you on your rights and help you respond to your insurance company.
The $10,000 minimum can be exhausted by a single emergency room visit, imaging studies, and a few weeks of specialist care. Coverage for ongoing costs can come from several sources once PIP is exhausted:
Washington allows your insurance company to seek reimbursement from your settlement proceeds after paying PIP benefits — a process called subrogation. A subrogation claim reduces the net amount you receive. Subrogation negotiation is a routine part of personal injury cases in Washington, and the amounts an insurance company can recover through PIP subrogation are subject to reduction under Mahler v. Szucs*, 135 Wn.2d 398 (1998), which requires the insurer to bear a pro rata share of the attorney fees and costs the insured incurred to generate the settlement. Freeman Law Firm addresses subrogation claims as part of every personal injury case.
Under RCW 48.22.005, PIP coverage applies to:
PIP is person-based coverage. It can apply whether you were driving your own car, riding as a passenger, or on foot near traffic when the accident occurred. If you're uncertain whether PIP applies to your situation, Freeman Law Firm can review the relevant policies and advise you on your coverage.
Drivers can reject PIP in writing under RCW 48.22.085, and the rejection applies to all household members who might otherwise have been covered. If the named insured later wants PIP reinstated, a new written request is required.
If your insurance company cannot produce a signed rejection, the minimum PIP coverage is in force under Washington law, regardless of any prior conversations about declining PIP. Freeman Law Firm has handled cases where PIP was rejected by the named insured years before an accident, eliminating coverage for household members who had no knowledge of the rejection. An attorney can request and review your policy documents to confirm what coverage was in place.
Washington law does not require drivers to carry personal injury protection, but every auto insurance company is required to offer it on each new and renewed liability policy under RCW 48.22.085. Drivers who decline PIP are required to do so with a signed written rejection.
Under RCW 48.22.005, PIP applies to the named insured and resident household family members. Coverage may also extend to passengers and others depending on the specific policy. PIP is person-based coverage — it can apply whether you're injured as a passenger in someone else's car, as a pedestrian, or as a cyclist.
Yes. Drivers can reject PIP with a signed written rejection under RCW 48.22.085. The rejection applies to all household members and remains in effect unless the named insured submits a new written request. If no signed rejection exists on file, the minimum coverage is in force under Washington law.
The personal injury attorneys of Freeman Law Firm have represented injured people across Washington in personal injury cases where PIP denials, exhausted benefits, and subrogation disputes directly affected recovery. Whether your insurance company denied PIP coverage, questioned your treatment, or you need help coordinating a PIP claim with a case against the at-fault driver, Freeman Law Firm will review your policies, treatment records, and the scope of your losses to advise you on how to proceed. Contact us at (253) 383-4500 or send us an email for a free consultation.
References and Additional Reading
https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/supreme-court/1998/64344-0-1.html
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=48.22.085
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=48.22.095
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=48.22.005
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=48.22.100
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=48.22.030
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Viewing or using this site does not create an attorney-client relationship with Freeman Law Firm, Inc. Case results depend on specific facts and cannot be guaranteed. For legal guidance for your individual situation, contact our office for a consultation.
