Download your free copy now to discover invaluable insights into the PI claim process.

A fully loaded commercial truck can weigh up to 80,000 pounds, and at highway speeds that mass produces forces that passenger vehicles cannot absorb. The type of truck, how the crash happened, and who was operating the vehicle all affect who can be held liable and what compensation may be available to you. How a crash happens directly affects how liability is established and what your case is worth, and Freeman Law Firm's Tacoma truck accident attorneys have handled cases across every type.
A jackknife accident happens when a truck's trailer swings outward while the cab continues forward, creating a folding angle that puts the trailer across one or more lanes of traffic. Sudden braking, slippery roads, and brake system failures are the most frequent causes, and the resulting crash can sweep multiple vehicles into the collision path.
Liability in a jackknife case can extend beyond the driver. Under RCW 46.37.010, trucking companies have a duty to keep their vehicles in safe operating condition, and a brake failure that contributes to a jackknife can expose the company to direct liability alongside the driver.
Rollover accidents happen when a truck tips onto its side or roof, with high speeds on curves and improperly loaded cargo as the leading causes. RCW 46.61.655 requires that cargo be secured so nothing shifts, leaks, or escapes during transit, and when an unsecured or unbalanced load contributes to a rollover, both the driver and the trucking company can be held liable for the resulting damages.
A truck that follows too closely, gets distracted, or fails to adjust speed for poor weather conditions can slam into the vehicle ahead with little or no warning. RCW 46.61.145 requires drivers to maintain a following distance that is reasonable and prudent for conditions, and when a truck driver fails to do so, that violation becomes direct evidence of negligence in your case.
A commercial truck's blind spots extend up to 20 feet in front of the cab, 30 feet behind the trailer, and across entire lanes on both sides, and a driver who changes lanes or turns without accounting for those zones can crush a passenger vehicle that was never visible to them. RCW 46.61.305 requires drivers to confirm lanes are clear before any lane change or turn, and RCW 46.37.400 mandates mirrors that meet specific field-of-view requirements. A violation of either statute strengthens your case that the driver's failure to see you was a breach of a duty they were required by law to meet.
When a truck runs a red light or fails to yield at an intersection and strikes the side of another vehicle, the force of impact is absorbed almost entirely by the door panel and frame closest to the point of contact. RCW 46.61.050 requires drivers to obey all traffic control devices, and RCW 46.61.180 governs right-of-way obligations, and a violation of either can be used as direct evidence of negligence in your case.
An under-ride accident occurs when a smaller vehicle slides beneath the rear or side of a truck, and the result is frequently fatal because the truck's frame shears off the top of the passenger compartment. Federal regulations require trucks to have under-ride guards, and RCW 46.37.517 mandates reflective tape and lighting on trailers to make trucks visible in low-light conditions. When a guard is missing, damaged, or non-compliant, or when a trailer lacks required lighting, the trucking company's failure to meet those standards becomes central to your case.
A head-on collision between a truck and a passenger vehicle is one of the deadliest crash types on the road, with the combined speed of both vehicles multiplying the force of impact. Wrong-way driving, overcorrecting, driver fatigue, and impairment are the most frequent causes, and RCW 46.61.150, which prohibits driving on the wrong side of the road, provides a direct statutory basis for establishing negligence when a truck crosses the centerline and strikes an oncoming vehicle.

Building a truck accident case starts with a thorough investigation, pulling accident reports, eyewitness accounts, black box data, driver logs, and maintenance records to establish what caused the crash and who bears responsibility. Washington's comparative negligence law under RCW 4.22.005 allows fault to be divided among multiple parties, and if you were to be found partially at fault, your compensation would be reduced by your percentage of responsibility.
Calculating the true extent of your damages is a difficult process. It includes not just your medical expenses and property damage, but also non-economic damages like pain and suffering. In Washington, there’s no cap on these types of damages, but having an experienced lawyer who understands how to make these calculations can help you get the maximum compensation.
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Viewing or using this site does not create an attorney-client relationship with Freeman Law Firm, Inc. Case results depend on specific facts and cannot be guaranteed. For legal guidance for your individual situation, contact our office for a consultation.
