When a commercial truck driver causes a crash in Washington, the driver isn’t usually the only party responsible for what happened. The trucking company that hired, dispatched, and supervised that driver may bear equal or greater responsibility under a legal doctrine called vicarious liability, which holds employers accountable for the conduct of their employees when that conduct occurs within the scope of employment. An injured victim's ability to recover full compensation frequently depends on whether the employer is held liable.
Respondeat superior is the form of vicarious liability that applies in employer-employee relationships, and it is the primary legal basis on which an injured victim pursues a trucking company for a driver's negligence in Washington. A trucking company does not need to have committed its own act of negligence for liability to attach. The driver's conduct alone is sufficient to hold the employer liable, even when the trucking company itself did nothing wrong.
The scope of employment test examines whether the driver was performing the type of work the employer hired the driver to do, and whether the driver was doing so within the time and location the employer authorized. When both conditions are met, the employer bears liability under respondeat superior for the driver's negligence.
Washington follows a proportionate fault system where each party found responsible for a crash is assigned a percentage of fault based on their contribution to the harm. In a truck accident case where both the driver and the trucking company are held liable, an injured victim can pursue compensation from both parties based on their assigned percentages.
Vicarious liability is established through the driver's conduct at the moment of a crash. The employer's decisions about how drivers are hired and supervised are what created the conditions under which that conduct occurred, and Washington state law and federal regulations place specific obligations on trucking companies that define the standard against which employer conduct is measured.
Federal regulations require trucking companies to verify each driver's qualifications before the driver gets behind the wheel:
Mandatory vetting exists to keep drivers with disqualifying histories out of commercial trucks. Federal regulations require trucking companies to screen drivers at hire and continue screening them throughout employment through annual motor vehicle record reviews and drug and alcohol testing. A company that skipped either initial or ongoing checks shares liability when an unqualified driver causes a crash.
Federal hours-of-service regulations cap commercial truck drivers at 11 hours of driving following 10 consecutive hours off duty, and no driver may be on duty for more than 14 consecutive hours regardless of how much of the on-duty time was spent driving. Employers who build delivery schedules that cannot be completed within drive-time limits put fatigued drivers on the road. Drivers who skip mandatory rest periods to finish routes faster do the same.
Trucking companies have real-time access to electronic logging device data documenting every hour a driver is on the road, and an employer who reviewed ELD records and failed to act on violations shares liability with the driver for crashes that result from fatigue.
A trucking company's obligation to maintain its fleet is one of the clearest expressions of the employer control that vicarious liability is built on. Federal regulations require trucking companies to inspect every commercial vehicle at least once every 12 months, with documented checks of the components most critical to safe operation:
Drivers are also required to inspect their vehicle before every run and report any defects to the trucking company. A company that receives a defect report and keeps the truck in service without making repairs has made a decision that directly contributed to the crash, and an injured victim can hold the employer responsible for that decision.
Vicarious liability requires an employment relationship, and trucking companies that classify drivers as independent contractors are arguing that no such relationship exists. When a crash occurs, the classification gives the company a basis to deny responsibility for the driver's actions. Washington law does not accept the classification at face value. Employment status is determined by the actual working relationship, and a driver classified as an independent contractor may still be treated as an employee if the company controlled the conditions of the driver's work.
Vicarious liability applies only when the driver was acting within the scope of employment at the time of the crash. Examples of conduct that falls within the scope of employment:
Not every situation falls cleanly into on-duty work and purely personal conduct. When a driver makes a personal stop during an active shift, Washington evaluates how far the driver departed from the assigned task and whether the activity served any purpose connected to the employer's business. Conduct that falls outside the scope of employment includes:
Vicarious liability determines not just who is responsible for a crash, but how much compensation an injured victim can access. Commercial trucking companies operating across state lines are required by federal law to carry a minimum of $750,000 in liability coverage if carrying general freight, and a minimum of $5 million if carrying hazardous materials. Trucking companies operating exclusively within Washington are required by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission to carry the same $750,000 minimum for vehicles over 10,000 pounds hauling non-hazardous freight, $1 million for other hazardous materials, and $5 million for bulk hazardous substances including explosives, compressed gas, and radioactive materials.
By comparison, Washington's minimum liability requirement for a standard passenger vehicle is $25,000 per person. Establishing vicarious liability against the trucking company gives an injured victim access to commercial insurance coverage that a claim against the driver alone cannot reach.
When an injured victim files a personal injury claim against a trucking company, the employer's own records are the primary evidence used to establish vicarious liability. Federal regulations require trucking companies to create and retain records documenting how they hire and train their drivers, and how they manage them once they are on the road. Separate requirements require trucking companies to retain maintenance logs, inspection reports, pre-trip inspection reports, and driver vehicle inspection reports for every truck in their fleet.
Other evidence used to establish vicarious liability includes:
Washington gives injured victims three years from the date of a crash to file a personal injury claim, but federal regulations only require trucking companies to retain electronic logging device data for six months and driver qualification files for the duration of employment plus three years.
The commercial truck accident lawyers of Freeman Law Firm has recovered millions in settlements for injured clients across Washington, including Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, and Spokane. When employer liability is at stake, Freeman Law Firm moves quickly to secure the records that establish the trucking company's responsibility and give injured victims access to the full scope of available coverage. Call Freeman Law Firm today at (253) 383-4500 for a free consultation.
References and Additional Reading
Washington State Law
Federal Regulations
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Viewing or using this site does not create an attorney-client relationship with Freeman Law Firm, Inc. Case results depend on specific facts and cannot be guaranteed. For legal guidance for your individual situation, contact our office for a consultation.
